heading
IBM launches eight-core Power7 processor
Graphics chips to power servers in two years
3D gaming: everything you need to know
IBM demonstrates 100GHz transistor
Lithium batteries could last 20 years
ATI Radeon HD 5570
ATI Radeon HD 5450
Intel Pentium G6950 vs. AMD Phenom II X2 550
Thermalright Venomous-X
Patriot PS-100 128GB
DISCUSS REVIEW
Early this year Thermaltake released their first exclusive Mini-ITX case, known as the Thermaltake SD100 Mini. This new light-weight, compact case is designed for the micro HTPC market, though we have found it to be quite versatile, serving very well as a desktop replacement...

Power consumption has become an increasingly important issue that nowadays plays a dual challenge for processing units. New processor architectures are more efficiency inclined than ever before as demand has sky-rocketed for more mobile and cooler units.

But perhaps even most important is today's worldwide need to cut down on power consumption. With many households carrying at least one or more PCs, and the proliferation of workstations at corporations, a considerable share of the power that we use can be attributed to computers.

Out of curiosity, I recently ran some power consumption tests on my own personal computer, which admittedly uses the latest hardware available in the market. Now, keep in mind this computer runs around the clock. The results were somewhat disturbing, sucking down about 300 watts at idle, and nearly 500 watts when under load. Combined with a 30” LCD and a number of additional devices attached to it, things start to add up, particularly the power bill.

After a more careful evaluation on how I spend my time using this computer, the overall setup didn't make much sense, as I'm lucky when I have enough time to play on my computer for a single hour on an average day. Moreover, a quad-core processor, four hard drives in RAID0, and a GeForce GTX 295 are not exactly necessary hardware for tasks such as web design, word processing, and sending e-mails.

Therefore I decided to split my computer into two: a simpler low powered desktop used for everything work related which will run 24/7, and a power guzzling gaming monster that will get used for a few hours here and there.

The question that now remains is, what is the best way of going about building a low-powered desktop computer that still has enough guts to get the job done? Another aspect that I really like about owning a low-powered desktop computer is that it can be small, really small, and this is where the Mini-ITX platform comes in. There are various ways to go when building a Mini-ITX computer though.

Given that I purchased my CPU/motherboard combo over 6 months ago now, the best option at the time appeared to be the Intel Atom 230 for which the Gigabyte GC230D was used. This tiny Gigabyte motherboard measures just 17 x 17cm (6.7 inches), and in this space it manages to incorporate an Intel 1.6GHz processor featuring 512KB of L2 cache. The Atom 230, which is built using a 45nm design process, boasts a core area of just 25mm2 and a thermal design process of a mere 4 watts!

Priced at just $95 US, this Gigabyte board represented pretty good value given it includes a motherboard, processor, and graphics engine in one. The next step was to pick a case/power supply combo to house it, a step that was not as easy as anticipated. Finding a small Mini-ITX case that doesn’t look like it was made out of a fruit loops box is actually very difficult. Furthermore, finding one at a reasonable price is near impossible. Enter the new Thermaltake SD100 Mini…

overclocking i7 750
Racing before Gran Turismo
NH-U12P best fan set up
Win 7 - Getting Name/Modified/...
The Third & The Seventh
ATI Radeon HD 5570 Review
ATI Radeon HD 5450 Review
TechSpot PC Buying Guide
Effortless Ways to Download Video Content from YouTube and Other Sites
ATI Radeon HD 5670 Review